NATIVITY OF ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST 2007 (TRINITY III)

During the past little while, culminating in a conversation that I had just yesterday, the topic of the depth of one’s commitment to God, to our respective individual vocations, has been very front and centre.

Also, just yesterday, we commemorated one of our own founders, our first bishop, Carmino de Catanzaro, who died 24 years ago yesterday.  He certainly stands out among moderns as one whose commitment and depth of vocation is beyond reproach.

And yet, it has been observed by Christian philosophical types throughout our 2,000 year history that, for even the mostly outwardly devout Christians, to have doubts is most, well, normal.  In fact some will observe that faith without doubts is not a very lively faith.  And not just the consciously formulated doubt, “Is Jesus really God Incarnate?”  Few of us indeed exhibit perfect faith all of the time.  Every time that we are with others, especially outside of the Church, and we forego the opportunity to identify ourselves as Christians, or fail to defend the Christian faith, we are guilty of doubt. 

Perhaps nowhere in Scripture is this point more plainly emphasized that in the Gospels.  How often do we read about the wavering faith of the Apostles themselves?  And in one of the more interesting episodes of that we have the example of the patron Saint of our country, St. John the Baptist, whose feast falls today.

During his public ministry, according to the record that we have in Scripture, John was a paragon of commitment to his vocation, and one who clearly understood his position as it related to the coming Messiah, “There cometh one mightier than I after me, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to stoop down and unloose.”  And shortly after that statement, his bold proclamation as Jesus approached him in Jordan River, “Ecce, Angus Dei,” “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.”

And yet, this apparently unshakeable faith seems to have done a St. Peter, if we may use that term to describe Peter’s waffling on Maundy Thursday.  In tonight’s second Lesson for the feast of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist, we read St. Matthew’s account of John’s imprisonment, and his anguished question sent to Jesus, “Art thou he that should come, or do we look for another?”  Some will suggest that John sent this question purely for the benefit of his own disciples; however, we should not be so hasty as to overlook the plain meaning.  After all, he joins the company of the Apostles in having such doubt.

There is possibly no better time than on the feast of our patron to review our own faith against the pressures of a world that, to a very large extent, has lost its focus on the Messiah.  As mentioned, John the Baptist is the patron Saint of? (Canada - the Roman Catholic Church in Canada has St. Joseph of Nazareth as their patron; but John Baptist is not just the patron Saint of? Québec.  And even in Québec they now call this day? Fête Nationale - doubt on a massively corporate scale).  This is certainly nothing new under the sun; at least since the time of Mohammed, if not right back to AD 32 or so, there have been suggestions that Jesus was just another one of the great prophets.

Therefore, why don’t we engage in the very same exercise that Jesus had John’s disciples do in about AD 32 - let us ponder the very same things that Jesus posed to them.  Which is to say, rather than a simple “Yes” to John’s question, our Lord told the disciples to consider the evidence.  He wasn’t just forthtelling the kingdom of God as had the earlier prophets, He was actually fulfilling it before their very eyes.  How often did Jesus mention in his public ministry that His works bore witness to the fact that He had been sent by God, and even if people found it difficult to accept Him at face value, they should believe for the very works’ sake.

Related to this, we must also observe that none of the Old Testament prophets, then not John the Baptist, neither Mohammed ever claimed to be God Incarnate.  Yes, there have been others who have made such claims throughout history, but they have pretty clearly been severely deluded - quite mad indeed. 

And against the popular mantra that Jesus is just another great moral teacher, we might recall C. S. Lewis’ comment about the gravity of Jesus’ claims about Himself in Mere Christianity, “I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: ‘I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept His claim to be God.’  That is the one thing we must not say.  A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher.  He would either be a lunatic -- on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg -- or else he would be the Devil of Hell.  You must make your choice.  Either this man was, and is, the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse.  You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill Him as a demon; or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord and God.  But let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about His being a great human teacher.  He has not left that open to us.  He did not intend to.”

Elsewhere, paraphrasing himself, and perhaps one of the most plagiarized-without-giving-credit, and often poorly defended lines of logic, Lewis plainly suggests that, when it comes to Jesus, it really boils down to three choices we can make: He was mad, He was a liar, or He was telling the truth.  The historical record, which is to say the Bible and also other records of His life such as that written by the Jewish historian Josephus, clearly indicate that he was not mad.  Again, by His examples and deeds, we have equally clear proof that He was not lying.  Granted, some of His claims will not be realized until His coming again; however in almost 2000 years, there is no sign that anything that He said or claimed about Himself is a lie.  Which leaves us with the third choice that, based on the proof of His acts and teaching, He must have been telling the truth.

Of course, in modern times, especially in western society, many have added a fourth choice, and that is to ignore Him or explain Him away by doubting the veracity of the record of His deeds - really just attempting to bring choice number two, that He was a liar, back into play.  Which may bring us to why so many people have become confused about Christianity when compared to other religions.  Most certainly, without Jesus, Christianity would be just another great philosophy for people who feel that it is important to be nice to other people.  However Christianity without Christ, or distilling Him down into just a nice guy, is not Christianity.  How did S. Paul state this?  Jesus is a "stumblingblock" to people of other religions or philosophies.  If anyone thinks about this seriously, they will quickly come to realize that, precisely because He is so unique, this is why so many throughout history have tried to explain Him away as merely a figure from the past who is not relevant to today's world.  Heed Lewis’ words elsewhere, “If Christianity is false, it is of no importance; if true, it is of infinite importance.  The one thing it cannot be is moderately important.”  Truthfully, I suspect that the majority of non-believers today are not so because of any deep philosophical considerations; rather, in my experience, it is simply because they won’t allow themselves even to bother to think about Jesus or the possibility of eternal life - but that’s another whole sermon topic.

“Art thou he that should come, or do we look for another?”  A natural question to ask when we naturally are confronted with doubts, when the crafts and assaults of the devil plant those seeds, when articulate non-believers tie us up in apparently logical knots.  When that happens, we should not fall prey to allowing those tares to take root among the good seed planted by the Word Incarnate; rather we should, as John did, turn to Jesus and ask the same question.  Then, with the luxury of His record of deeds, by the proof of His mighty Resurrection and glorious Ascension, and by the further example of the wonderfully changed lives of millions of believers throughout human history who have followed our Lord by taking up their own crosses, putting others before themselves and truly providing living examples of the kingdom of God on earth, we once again turn to Him in praise, adoration and thanksgiving.

And let us not leave our thoughts of John the Baptist as of one who is known for having doubted our Lord’s Messiahship.  Rather, let us draw encouragement from that for which he is truly known, inspired by the depth of his vocation and commitment so that we too may constantly speak the truth, against the pressures of political correctness; boldly rebuke vice, against the risk of “not being cool”, but perhaps more especially our own besetting sins; and, perhaps most difficult of all, patiently suffer for the truth’s sake, against the internal desire for self-satisfaction and avoidance of any discomfort.

ANNUNCIATION     OTTAWA 2007          +CR