SUNDAY AFTER ASCENSION 2007

“He ascended into heaven, And sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty.”

We’ve just heard read the second of the two Exhortations in the Prayer Book, a sure sign to regular church-goers that we are nearing one of the major feasts in the calendar - next Sunday being Pentecost.  Yet, in actual fact we are just in between two major feasts; Thursday past was Ascension Day and next Sunday, Pentecost, both of which, along with Christmas and Easter, are traditional “days of obligation” when all faithful Christians did their utmost to ensure that they were able to avail themselves of the Sacrament of the Altar.

The two particular feasts between which we find ourselves are placed in the calendar according to the exact chronology as presented in the Bible: Jesus ascended 40 days after His Resurrection; Thursday past being exactly 40 days from Easter, and 10 days later the Holy Spirit descended upon the disciples in Jerusalem on Pentecost, a term meaning the fiftieth day shared by both Christians and Jews, the Feast of Weeks beginning 50 days after Passover for the latter, and the descent of the Holy Spirit being 50 days after the Resurrection.

The feast of the Ascension tends, quite naturally in our very busy society, to get the short end of the stick, falling as it always does on a Thursday, outside of the radar screen of most working people who understandably find it difficult to make time during their hectic work week for such an interruption.  Indeed, other denominations who follow the same calendar, such as the local Roman Catholic Diocese, have transferred the feast to today.  They do the same for other major feasts if they fall on a weekday, such as the Epiphany, transferring it to the closest Sunday so as to accommodate the greatest number of worshippers.  Being firmly stuck in the mud, we maintain the old ways; however, we do usually save our message for the Sunday next.

Ascensiontide - such a very short season in the Church year; and yet we are confronted with the import of it every day in the year, as we recite the Apostles’ Creed morning and evening - “He ascended into heaven, And sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty.”  Along with the Virgin Birth and the Resurrection, a uniquely Christian fact, and along with the Virgin Birth and the Resurrection, one that is under attack, not only from without the Church, but from within.

Therefore what better time for us to ask some fundamentally important questions.  This is personally very topical, just having returned from England, the cradle of Anglicanism, but now one of the most secularized countries in the world.  How do we, how do our English brothers and sisters view the fundamentally unique Christian beliefs of the Incarnation, the Resurrection and the Ascension?

In perusing source material, I came across a sermon by Fr. David Curry, one of the remaining stalwarts in the Diocese of Nova Scotia in the Anglican Church of Canada.  On a sermon for this Sunday several years ago, he comments, “There is the religion of Jesus in the heart, the religion of sentiment and feeling.  There is, too, the religion of Jesus the moral policeman, the religion of outward conformity to the shifting demands of social and political correctness.  Neither of them is the religion of the risen and ascended Christ who “sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty”, which is what the Creeds say out of the Scriptures.  And without the risen and ascended Christ of the Scriptures creedally understood, they are altogether empty and destructive, the religion of empty hearts and whitened sepulchres.

“It is what happens when we try to reduce God to where we are rather than to be lifted up to where he is.  Our lives are to be found in the comings and goings of God, not God in our comings and goings.  There is all the difference in the world between these two perspectives: the one would make God subject to us; the other would place us with God in the revelation of his truth and love.”

You may have heard similar sentiments expressed from this small pulpit before: true Christianity is not about recreating God in our image, rather it is in acknowledging that we are created in His image and our behaviour should reflect that; western Christianity has fallen into the habit of bringing God down to our level rather than raising us, fallen creatures, to Him - and so forth.

Whether we think on those past reflections or on Fr. Curry’s erudite musings on the same topic, we must surely decide which side of the argument, which perspective rings most truly.  It can be difficult indeed when one is confronted with one of the post-Christian spin doctors, very often still occupying a pew or even a sanctuary prayer desk in the Church.  They have learned very well from the liberal humanists in terms of how to present a position aimed at shutting off discussion, even making those who would hold to an orthodox belief to feel hopelessly unenlightened.  Don’t let them fool you!  They, in fact, are the ones who have been fooled, possibly unknowingly - having perhaps subconsciously bought into the post-Enlightenment need for empirical proof for absolutely everything.  “We can’t prove by chemistry or physics that Jesus was born of a Virgin, that He rose from the dead, that He ascended bodily in the sight of the Apostles, indeed such things are clearly impossible (by our current understanding of how things work in the universe), therefore such things are not to be believed.”  With such a limited application of our rational capabilities, it is not difficult to see how so many have perhaps unwittingly ended up “reducing God to where we are rather than our being lifted up to where He is.”

This is the true battleground on which orthodox Christianity has been waging a battle for a few centuries now; and it appears that the battle will continue for the foreseeable future.  We must hold fast, rallying behind the Saints who have gone before, committed wholly to the defence of the faith, both in their own time, and for posterity.

A warning: the battle is not one where we make progress in the defence of the faith by using forceful means; rather, the most effective weapon is the fruits of the Spirit as evidence of the indwelling of the Spirit of the Risen and Ascended Christ in us.  As a former marginal believer, a scientist who needed empirical proof to believe anything, I can attest to the effectiveness of the quiet, patient example of true believers.  They did not convince me of how science can quite firmly limit our capacity for expansive rational thought - that came to me in a flash.  But their very different lives were certainly a powerful catalyst for making me willing to open that door just a crack and look beyond x and y, beyond physical dimensional boundaries.

Next Sunday we come to another of the events recorded in Scripture that fall into the category of: beyond that which can be explained by empirical scientific study - the descent of the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost.  Yet another of those events where faith is required in order for us to believe, and only in first believing, then to understand.

With the words of the exhortation ringing freshly in our ears, and against the tendency to believe centrally important aspects of Christianity only marginally, we might do well to ponder particularly the reference to the reception of the blessed Sacrament of the Body and Blood of our Saviour Jesus Christ.  The exhortation paraphrases St. Paul in Chapter 11 of his first letter to the Church in Corinth where it says, “Which (the Sacrament) being so divine and comfortable a thing to them that will presume to receive it worthily, and so dangerous to them that will presume to receive it unworthily.”  Now, as we state at every celebration of the Holy Eucharist, “we are not worthy,” one might ask how that can be reconciled to St. Paul’s warning and that of the exhortation.

The sentiment in the Prayer of Humble Access is spot on: none of us is ever truly worthy to receive so great and wonderful a gift.  Yet, insofar as we do believe, insofar as we avoid the tendency to bring God down to our level and attempt to imbue Him with the same faulty personality characteristics that beset us, insofar as we desire always to be lifted up to where He is, insofar as we, like the centurion pray fervently, “Lord, I am not worthy that Thou shouldest come under my roof, but speak the word only,” then we become less unworthy.

“He ascended into heaven, And sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty.”  So I believe.

THE ANNUNCIATION         OTTAWA 2007          +CR